Bishop

Bishop v. Barndt

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 786·43 Cal. App. 149·184 P. 901
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 1919Civ. No. 2982.California3,164 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This, in form an action to quiet title, is, in effect, one to declare a forfeiture of the rights of all the defendants in and to the real property in question. The facts of the case appear from the findings, fully supported by the testimony.

By an agreement of sale, made on February 6, 1913, the plaintiff agreed to sell, and the defendant, Elizabeth J, Barndt, agreed to buy, the land in question for the sum of one thousand three hundred dollars, payable one hundred dollars upon the execution of the agreement, four hundred dollars on March 1, 1914, four hundred dollars on March 1, 1915, and four hundred dollars on March 1, 1916, with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum, payable semiannually, the buyer to pay all taxes after March 1, 1913. This contract, almost immediately after its execution, was assigned and transferred to defendant Stick, and, together with said assignment on the back thereof, was recorded in the office of the county recorder of Orange County, but not until May 29, 1915, just before this action was commenced. Time is the essence of the contract.

On August 14, 1913,. defendant Stick sold the property under another contract to defendant Beulah B.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.