Hersh

This is an appeal by intervener Hirschfeld from that portion of the judgment in the above-entitled matter in favor of plaintiff and against said intervener and the whole thereof, and from the order of court denying a new trial to said intervener.

In our opinion filed this day in Civil No. 7490, Hersh v. Garau* [ 14 Pac. (2d) 434 ] which is on the appeal of the defendants Garau from the judgment,- we have rendered an opinion which covers the principal issues in the case. In addition to the points discussed in said opinion, appellant Hirschfeld attempts to raise several points which he does not distinctly set out, referring in one part of his brief to certain findings of the trial court which he objects to, without stating exactly what his grounds of objection are, or without setting forth the findings themselves, or their substance, as required by rule VIII of the rules of practice of this court. It is sufficient to say that each of the findings objected to is supported by the evidence.

The principal objection of the intervener Hirschfeld seems to be that the court refused him permission to file an amended complaint. Three years elapsed before intervener filed his complaint in…