Annunzio

People v. Annunzio

Good Law
120 Cal. App. 89·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 97·7 P.2d 739
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 1932Docket No. 135.California2,523 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

The defendant was charged in an information filed by the district attorney of Tulare County, with the crime of child stealing, it being alleged that on or about October 15, 1931, he maliciously, forcibly and fraudulently took and enticed away one Opal Hunnicutt, a minor child, with intent to detain and conceal such child from her father, in whose lawful charge she was. The defendant was found guilty by a jury, and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction.

The first point raised is that the evidence does not support the verdict, in that it does not show a talcing and enticing away of a minor child with both the intent to detain and the intent to conceal such child from the parent having legal charge of it. The appellant contents himself with setting forth his argument of law without reference to the facts, placing the entire burden of examining the record on the court, with such assistance as has been given by the attorney-general.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows: Opal Hunnicutt, the minor in question, was sixteen years of age. Her parents were separated, the mother being in San Francisco while the father, who had custody of the minor, lived in Dinuba,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.