Alciatti

Alciatti v. Origlia

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 206·49 Cal. App. 756·194 P. 740
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1920Civ. No. 3540.California1,393 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover for the alleged breach of a contract to sell a quantity of wine and for the commission claimed to be due for the sale of the same. They recovered a general judgment, based upon both counts, and the defendant appeals.

The defendant, a wine grower, signed and delivered to U. Grossini a paper reading as follows:

At the same time she gave. Grossini samples of the wine, which he submitted to several parties including the plaintiffs. The samples were satisfactory and the plaintiffs prepared a form of contract, in duplicate, for the defendant to sign, which they gave to Grossini together with a cheek for $1000, payable to Mrs. Origlia, as a deposit on the purchase price. The agreement, as prepared by the plaintiffs, specified that the defendant agreed to and did sell to plaintiffs thirty-two to thirty-three thousand gallons of red wine, and three thousand eight hundred gallons of white wine, as per “samples furnished by A. Grossini, Broker, and the price is fixed at 50c a gallon F. O. B. Morgan Hill, Calif.,” the plaintiffs agreeing “to pay for the wine bought, as soon as same is delivered,” deducting from the total the deposit of $1000,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.