Frankel

Frankel v. Rosenfield

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 548·95 Cal. App. 647·273 P. 122
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1928Docket No. 6278.California1,553 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

Plaintiff, Julius Frankel, brought this action to recover a money judgment against defendant, as the alleged guarantor of a conditional sales contract, and to obtain an order directing a bank to deliver to the sheriff certain corporate stock belonging to defendant and claimed by plaintiff to have been deposited with said bank as collateral security, so that the same could be sold in liquidation of the judgment which plaintiff sought to obtain. Judgment was given in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Assuming that the agreements of the parties hereinafter set forth legally established a contract of guaranty, the determinative issue in the case was and is whether, as defendant claims and as the trial court found, plaintiff released the original debtor, for if he did his act in so doing released the guarantor also, and it would follow that the judgment was properly entered in defendant’s favor. The material facts surrounding the transaction, which are without substantial dispute, may be stated as follows: Plaintiff and his son, George Frankel, and a party named Miller whose rights are not here involved, were stockholders and directors in a corporation named the M. C. Hat and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.