Keeley

Keeley v. Erbe

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 324·33 Cal. App. 267·164 P. 906·164 P.2d 906
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 1917Civ. No. 1987.California280 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action brought by him to recover the reasonable value of legal services.

From the record it appears that the parties entered into a written contract, under the terms of which the plaintiff was to render services as an attorney at law for the defendant upon a contingent fee of twenty-five per cent of the value of certain land if title thereto should be obtained for defendant. Subsequently, according to the testimony given by plaintiff, a circumstance was called to his attention for the first time which made the prospect of securing title in the name of the defendant very doubtful; whereupon plaintiff told the defendant “that the situation did not look good to him,” and refused to proceed under the contract. They then entered into an oral agreement whereby the plaintiff should proceed to render the agreed services, he to be paid a fair fee, without, however, there being any agreement as to its amount. The defendant denied that there had been a rescission and abandonment of the written contract.

Oral evidence was admissible to prove that the parties entered into a new and distinct agreement as a substitute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.