Penello

Peoples State Bank v. Penello

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 294·67 Cal. App. 103·227 P. 190
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1924Civ. No. 2695 Civ. No. 2696.California2,461 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Young, J.

These two actions were consolidated and tried together before the same jury. Judgments were rendered in favor of plaintiff on directed verdicts, and from these judgments the defendants appeal. The actions have been twice tried, and this is the second time that they are before this court. The first trial resulted in verdicts and judgments in favor of defendants, and upon appeals, prosecuted by plaintiff, the judgments were reversed. (See Peoples State Bank v. Penello, 59 Cal. App. 174 [ 210 Pac. 432 ].) The actions were commenced on April 22, 1921, and they were first tried in October of that year. The trial resulting in these appeals was had in November, 1923. In each action the plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the bank, sues on three promissory notes for the aggregate sum of $1,000, made by the defendant in favor of Hunt-Jewett-Bontz Company, a California corporation, and by it transferred to the bank. The notes were given for subscriptions for stock of the said company, and the defendants claim they were induced to sign them by fraudulent representations made by the stock salesmen. They admit the execution of the notes, but resist payment on three grounds, predicated on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.