In Re Baker

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 264·32 Cal. App. 320·162 P. 922
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 13, 1916Crim. No. 522.California1,729 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

The petitioner is in custody of the sheriff of Kern County by virtue of a commitment issued out of the superior court of that county. Claiming that his imprisonment is unlawful, he applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted. The commitment is based upon an order made by the superior court on date September 26, 1916, wherein petitioner was required to pay a fine of five hundred dollars as punishment for a contempt of court; and wherein it was further ordered that in default of payment of the fine he be imprisoned in the county jail until the fine is satisfied at the rate of one day’s imprisonment for each $2 unpaid of the fine.

Petitioner was sheriff of Kern County for the term ending in January, 1915, when he was succeeded by D. B. Newell, the present sheriff. During the year 1913, one Matthew Bailey commenced an action in the superior court of Kern County against Security Trust Company, a corporation, to recover possession of certain corporation certificates of stock and other documents. Under claim and delivery proceedings in that action, Baker, as sheriff, took possession of that property. Thereafter Bailey applied to the superior court for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.