Quin

I. W. Williams Co. v. Ah Quin

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 635·44 Cal. App. 296·186 P. 401
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 1919Civ. No. 2417.California866 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Three of the defendants in the above-entitled action have appealed from a judgment entered against them. There was a motion for a new trial and formal notice of appeal from the order denying said motion. Under the present practice, no separate appeal is allowed to be taken from an order refusing a new trial, although the questions settled on such a motion in the trial court are reviewable on the appeal from the judgment. The separate appeal taken from the order is therefore dismissed.

This action was brought against the defendants to recover from them severally an amount of money alleged to be due on account of merchandise sold. In the complaint it is set forth that in January, 1915, the individual defendants “pretended to organize a corporation”; that articles of incorporation were filed with the Secretary of State and with the county clerk, but that nothing further was done toward completion of said corporation, and that no stock was issued to the incorporators or anyone else; that no officers or directors were ever elected; that no meetings were held by the defendants who pretended to organize the corporation; that the pretended corporation “never had any capital whatever” and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.