Cornell

Cornell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 323·53 Cal. App. 317·199 P. 1087
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 1921Civ. No. 2315.California3,084 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The action was for damages caused by the failure of defendant to promptly deliver a telegram, and plaintiff had judgment for the sum of $534, from which the appeal is taken. The telegram was left at the office of L. N. Cornell, a brother of plaintiff, who was away at the time, and was not delivered to plaintiff until several days thereafter. The telegram was sent by one W. H. Coffinberry from South San Francisco, and related to a loan of $5,000 from the South San Francisco Cattle Loan Co., for which plaintiff had made application to enable him to purchase some cattle.

As to the damage suffered by plaintiff the court found: “That on the 27th day of September, 1916, plaintiff held an option from D. H. McLemore to purchase from him 178 cattle, consisting of red heifers which were then located in the state of Oregon; that said McLemore had agreed with plaintiff to sell cattle to plaintiff within five days from said date for the price and sum of $5,000, and deliver said cattle to plaintiff at Porterville, California, freight paid; that said cattle were reasonably worth to plaintiff at said time the sum of $5,534; that plaintiff had abundant feed at said Porterville with which to feed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.