Gianelli

Gianelli v. Briscoe

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 151·40 Cal. App. 532·181 P. 105
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 1919Civ. No. 1928.California1,484 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The pleadings disclose that there is a dispute between the parties as to whether or not, for about fourteen years, there was a partnership existing in the saloon business in the city of Stockton, between Andrew Gianelli, plaintiff’s intestate, who commenced the action, and the defendant.

The complaint was filed on October 16, 1916; it was alleged that a partnership between the parties was formed in April, 1902; that it existed until July 2, 1916, at which time defendant took exclusive possession of the partnership property and has prevented plaintiff from having access thereto, and retains the income derived from said business. The prayer of the complaint was that said partnership be dissolved; that a receiver be appointed to take possession of the partnership property; that defendant be ordered to account to plaintiff for all moneys and property received by him, in running said partnership, since the second day of October, 1912; that plaintiff’s share thereof be paid to him by the receiver out of the proceeds realized from the sale of the property and for judgment against defendant for any deficiency.

On April 16, 1917, the trial court caused to be filed an “Interlocutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.