Mordecai

San Francisco M. Co. Ltd. v. Mordecai

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 755·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 153·26 P.2d 669
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 1933Docket No. 9069.California2,552 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Noubse, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of the defendant Mordecai for a change of venue. The plaintiff filed a complaint in the city and county of San Francisco containing four separate and distinct causes of action against four separate defendants praying separate and distinct relief against each defendant upon the cause of action specially pleaded as to him. The defendant Mordecai moved for a change of venue to the county of Madera, which was the county of his legal residence. The two corporate defendants had their residence in the city and county of San Francisco. The defendant Ornbaum was a resident of Stanislaus County. At the hearing of the motion these three defendants consented to the change. The theory of the motion was that these three defendants were improperly joined for the sole purpose of placing the venue of the action in the city and county of San Francisco. The plaintiff justified the joinder of these defendants on the theory that it was in doubt as to which of the defendants was liable.

Section 379a of the Code of Civil Procedure provides: “All persons may be joined as defendants against whom the right to any relief is alleged to exist, whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.