Biurrun

Biurrun v. Elizalde

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 609·61 Cal. App. 675·215 P. 690
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 1923Civ. No. 2604.California1,136 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of defendant Ramirez for a nonsuit.

The action is for money had and received. The plaintiff testified: “On -the twenty-sixth day of December, 1919, I had business dealings with the defendant Elizalde. . . . Defendant Ramirez was present at that time. I offered to let Mr. Elizalde run my sheep until he could sell them, and agreed with him that I would pay him $2,176 as expenses for running them, and when he sold the sheep he was to pay me $8 per head and beep for himself all that he received over that sum. ... I had 728 head of sheep that I turned over to Mr. Elizalde. . . . We had a conversation outside on the same day, and Mr. Ramirez suggested that we make a note, and Mr. Ramirez wrote a note for us for the sum of $8,000. After I got the note I took it up to Mr. Carlin's office and Mr, Carlin said it was no good, and he drew another note, which note Elizalde signed. ... I took Elizalde's note in payment of the sheep. . . . Q. Did you sell your sheep at that time to Elizalde? A. I gave him to run the sheep. . . . Q. Did you sell them to him on that day? A. No, sir. Q. Why did you take that note for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.