McNamara

People v. McNamara

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 583·65 Cal. App. 521·224 P. 476
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 1924Crim. No. 1156.California1,200 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Defendant was charged by information with the crime of burglary. Upon arraignment he pleaded not guilty. He was tried and convicted of the offense in the second degree. Thereafter he presented motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. These motions were denied, and he was sentenced to imprisonment for the term prescribed by law. This is an appeal from the judgment and from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

The main point relied upon for a reversal is that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict. It appears therefrom that Mrs. Agnes Murray, the complaining witness, on the evening of March 3, 1923, at about 7 o’clock P. M., left the flat where she was living at 892 Eddy Street, in the city of San Francisco, and returned shortly after midnight. She then discovered that a ladder had been placed against the house, and upon investigation ascertained that her personal effects had been disturbed and some of her clothing was missing, among which was a certain black dress. It was found in the possession of and being worn by one Grace Ford, who was living with the defendant in a room on Ellis Street. Upon being questioned concerning her possession of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.