Tunmore

Tunmore v. McLeish

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 289·45 Cal. App. 266·187 P. 443
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 1919Civ. No. 3135.California1,129 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for a new trial. The action was one for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff by reason of a collision between a motorcycle, on which the plaintiff was riding, and an automobile being driven by the defendant. The verdict of the jury was for the defendant. A motion for a new trial was made upon six grounds. The order granting the motion was upon four grounds. [1] The first of these grounds is stated to be: “Irregularity of jurors in examining motorcycle out of court. ’ ’ The facts in relation to this incident, as they appear from the affidavit of Nora Tunmore, the wife of the plaintiff, and a witness in the case, are that during a recess of the court and before the introduction in evidence of the motorcycle upon which the plaintiff was riding at the time of the accident, two jurymen carefully examined the motorcycle, and its various parts, and in discussing the said motorcycle at the time of this examination, one of said jurymen stated to the other that it was impossible for the plaintiff’s wife to have seen the speedometer from where she was sitting on the rear seat at the time of the accident. It also appears from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.