Perry

Perry v. A. Paladini, Inc.

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 125·89 Cal. App. 275·264 P. 580
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1928Docket No. 6224.California5,008 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Parker, J.

Plaintiff brought action against defendants to recover for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by him through the negligence of defendants. In the court below plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant A. Paladini, Inc., a corporation, and from this judgment said defendant presents the appeal. Included in the review is the lower court’s order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The question here presented centers about the liability of appellant corporation. For the purposes hereof certain facts are conceded. It is admitted that plaintiff did receive injuries as the result of the negligence of one Raymond Zanetta in the operation of a certain automobile truck. It is conceded that plaintiff was without contributory negligence, and no claim is made that the damages awarded are excessive. It is the contention of appellant that it was not the owner of the truck driven by Zanetta, nor was it in any manner connected with or interested in the operation of the truck. Aside from attacking the sufficiency of the evidence on the issue, appellant further contends that the court below erred in its rulings on the admissibility of certain testimony offered. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.