Mayen

People v. Mayen

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 286·49 Cal. App. 314·193 P. 173
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 1920Crim. No. 741.California351 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The defendant in this ease was convicted of a felony and sentenced to the state’s prison at San Quentin. Thereafter, defendant having taken an appeal to this court, the judge of the trial court issued a certificate of probable cause. Thereafter the judge of the court below revoked his certificate of probable cause. Defendant thereupon applied to this court for a stay of execution of the sentence until such time as he can lawfully apply to a justice of this court for a certificate of probable cause, that is, until the record on his appeal shall have been transmitted to this court.

We are constrained to the view that, under the authority of People v. Lane, 96 Cal. 596 , [ 31 Pac. 580 ], and People v. Gallanar, 144 Cal. 656 , [ 79 Pac. 378 ], we have no discretion in the matter but must grant the stay of execution until defendant can exercise the right granted him by section 1243 of the Penal Code, i. e., the right to apply to a justice of this court for a certificate of probable cause.

It has been suggested by the district attorney that, subsequent to defendant’s conviction and while he was confined in the county jail in the custody of the sheriff, he attempted to escape. In our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.