Riffee

Riffee v. Gray Top Cab Co.

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 277·84 Cal. App. 110·257 P. 447
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 1927Docket No. 5827.California347 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries suffered in a collision with an automobile operated by an agent of the defendant Gray Top Cab Company. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars. The defendants appealed on a typewritten transcript under section 953b of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Three grounds of appeal are noted in the appellants’ brief—insufficiency of the evidence, errors in law, and “plaintiff’s negligence proximately contributed to the accident.” The first and third grounds are supported by brief excerpts from the testimony favorable to the appellants’ side of the case, but neither the evidence in conflict with this nor the findings of the trial court are printed as required by section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure. The respondent has not come to the aid of appellants in this respect, but has merely filed a brief in the nature of a motion to affirm because of appellants’ failure to comply with the code requirements.

The errors of law assigned have been presented in the same manner. It is argued that the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.