Hutton

C. Scheerer & Co. v. Hutton

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 336·7 Cal. App. 524·94 P. 849
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 1908Civ. No. 473.California1,059 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Petition for a writ of mandate.

It appears from the record that the city of Los Angeles instituted a proceeding for. the condemnation of certain property for public use; that the defendants in said action waived a jury; that thereupon the court appointed three disinterested persons referees to ascertain the compensation to be paid to such defendants; that such referees made their report to the court, from which it appears that in a certain tract of land sought to be condemned in the action petitioner had an interest by virtue of a certain lease therein, which leasehold was of the value of $300 and to that amount the lessees were entitled to compensation; that the total compensation proper to be paid to certain other defendants, own ers of the fee in the premises affected by such leasehold, was $6,441.85. After the coming in of said report, and within due time, one of the owners of the fee in the tract above mentioned filed his exceptions to the report of the referees upon the ground that the party so filing his exceptions was the owner in his own right of all of the fee, and that the other parties named therein had no interest, and that it was not true that petitioner herein, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.