Crum

Crum v. Crum

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 479·57 Cal. App. 539·207 P. 506
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 1922Civ. No. 2441.California2,308 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

J.—The plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce from the defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty. The decree also awarded to plaintiff the custody of the minor child of the parties, Mabel Buth Crum, age seven years, the only issue of the marriage of said parties, and one-half of the community property, consisting principally of real estate. The personal property, of which there was a small amount, and which also belonged to the community, was awarded to the defendant.

The defendant appeals from the judgment under the alternative method upon the sole ground that the testimony of plaintiff as to the acts of cruelty alleged to have been committed by the defendant upon her was not legally corroborated.

The parties intermarried in the state of Missouri, in the month of May, 1908, and removed to Kings County, this state, about two shears later.

The complaint alleges that on numerous occasions from the year in which the parties were married until May 12, 1920, on which latter date they separated and ceased' living together, the defendant “has treated plaintiff in an ex tremely cruel and inhuman manner,” following which averment is a specification of certain acts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.