Paulson

Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District v. Paulson

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 126·75 Cal. App. 57·242 P. 494
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 3, 1925Docket No. 2979.California5,066 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

In this proceeding three eases are involved, to wit, one hearing the above title, one Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District v. B. G. Kline and Minnie E. Kline, superior court action, number 3300, and Edna L. Knight v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District, superior court action, number 3435. It is stipulated that all three cases should be tried as one in the superior court upon the testimony introduced in the case of Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District v. John Paulson, that separate judgments should be entered in each action, that the appeals herein should be combined, one transcript being used for the three appeals, and that when judgment is entered in the ease of District v. Paulson a like judgment should follow in the other cases. This action was begun by the respondent Irrigation District to enjoin the appellant Paulson from interfering with the ditches owned by the respondent District; also, to restrain him from diverting water therefrom. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appeals.

The transcript shows that the appellant owns land situate within the flow of that certain canal known as and called the Central Canal, which canal was used for a considerable period of time in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.