Fletcher

Hueneme, Malibu & Port Los Angeles Railway v. Fletcher

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 652·65 Cal. App. 698·224 P. 774
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 1924Civ. No. 4326.California1,951 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

On November 24, 1906, one Joseph H. Call and his wife conveyed to plaintiff a strip of land sixty feet wide across their rancho as a right of way for a railroad. No construction work was ever done upon this right of way. Ten years later Call and his wife deeded to the county of Los Angeles a strip across the rancho, also sixty feet wide, as a right of way for a highway. Nearly fifteen years after the deed to plaintiff the Calls conveyed to the state of California a strip across the rancho eighty feet wide as a right of way for a state highway. The parcels conveyed by these three deeds, except for the greater width of the parcel last conveyed, are practically coterminous and coincident with each other, although each departs from each of the others occasionally along the side lines. The deed to the state recites that it is “subject to any right of way heretofore conveyed by the grantors to” plaintiff. After the conveyance to the state the strip described in its deed was entered upon by defendants, under authority of the state, for the purpose of constructing a state highway along it. Entry was at the same time made upon the parcels formerly conveyed by the Calls to plaintiff and to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.