Bank

Bank v. Bell

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 459·62 Cal. App. 320·217 P. 538
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 1923Civ. No. 4382.California5,052 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sure, J.

This appeal involves the decision of the question whether or not the city of Berkeley has the power to acquire, establish, maintain, own, and operate a municipal market. In this connection provisions of the constitution of California relative to municipal affairs, certain sections of Berkeley’s charter vital to its claims of “home rule,” and ordinances passed in conformity therewith, are to be considered and discussed and an opinion thereon given.

The city of Berkeley, through its council, on February 23, 1921, adopted Ordinance No. 699, N. S., establishing a market to be known and designated as the Berkeley Municipal Market, declaring that said market shall be maintained, equipped, owned, and operated by the city of Berkeley ; declaring the purposes of said market; determining the price at which foodstuffs shall be bought and sold by said market; requiring all funds from whatever source to be kept in a bank in the city of Berkeley; creating the office of market manager; providing the mode of filling the office of market manager; determining the mode of removing the market manager; prescribing the duties of market manager; authorizing the employment of other persons; providing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.