Peerless Insurance & Brokerage Co. v. Dwyer Equipment Co.

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 230·78 Cal. App. 141·248 P. 303
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1926Docket No. 4477.California1,240 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Houser, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Dwyer Equipment Company from a judgment rendered against it in an action in claim and delivery.

The basic facts appear to be that on a conditional sales contract the plaintiff sold an automobile to one Porter, who left it with one Blake to be painted. The paint job having been completed and no payment having been made therefor, under the then provisions of the law (secs. 3051 and 3052 of the Civil Code) Blake proceeded to enforce the lien which he claimed and thereunder sold the automobile to the defendant Dwyer Equipment Company. The plaintiff company offered reimbursement, which was declined, following iwhieh this action was commenced and which resulted in 'a judgment for plaintiff as against Dwyer Equipment Company.

Appellant specifies as error that the findings and judgment of the trial court were not supported by the evidence, and that such findings and judgment are contrary to law.

The findings which are attacked are as follows:

“That plaintiff now is, and at all times in plaintiff’s complaint mentioned has been, entitled to the possession of that certain personal property, more particularly described as follows: (describing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.