Hincksman

Hincksman v. Delacour

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 564·47 Cal. App. 416·190 P. 832
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 10, 1920Civ. No. 3242.California1,394 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, as vendor in a contract for the sale of real estate, against the defendants, who were vendees in possession, to recover possession of the land, and damages for the retention thereof, after alleged breach of the contract in failing to make payments, and for a judgment declaring the contract to have been broken, quieting plaintiff’s title to the land, and for general equitable relief.

The defendants in their amended answer to the complaint denied a willingness on the part of the plaintiff to carry out the terms of the contract, and pleaded an affirmative equitable defense, based upon the ground of false and fraudulent representations, made to induce them to purchase the land. The same affirmative matter was set up in an amended cross-complaint, with a prayer for a rescission of the contract, and for an accounting of moneys paid to the plaintiff, and a finding as to the amount cross-complainants had expended in the necessary and proper care and maintenance of the property, and for judgment therefor. Plaintiff demurred to the amended answer and amended cross-complaint, and moved to strike out all the affirmative matter contained therein. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.