Titus

Titus v. Strehl

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 65·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 501·14 P.2d 142
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 1932Docket No. 8590.California608 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

On January 8, 1926, defendant Strehl was the owner of a parcel of real property in Alameda County. He was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $-775. On that date Strehl conveyed the property to defendant Eleanor Le Conte, who on April 23, 1926, conveyed the same to the Stockholders’ Auxiliary Corporation by a deed of trust to secure the payment of the sum of $1250. Previous to the first transfer plaintiff brought suit on his claim, and on June 23, 1927, procured a judgment against defendant Strehl therefor. An execution issued, by virtue of which the interest of Strehl in the property was levied upon and sold at sheriff’s sale, the plaintiff being the purchaser. Thereafter a sheriff’s deed to the property was executed to plaintiff, following which the present action was brought to have the transfer from Strehl to Le Conte adjudged void as to plaintiff, it being alleged that the same was voluntary and without consideration; that it was made in contemplation of insolvency and resulted in the insolvency of the grantor; also that the transfer was made with intent to delay and defraud creditors, and that the grantee took with notice of the facts alleged in the complaint. It was also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.