McIntire

McIntire v. Chevrolet Motor Co.

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 187·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 640·1 P.2d 40
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 1931Docket No. 494.California2,349 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal by the superior court after the demurrers of defendants to his amended complaint were sustained by said court, without leave to amend. *Page 188 Appellant makes no point of the refusal of permission to amend, and bases his appeal solely on the sufficiency of the complaint. The action was instituted to recover damages arising from an alleged conspiracy between defendants by means of which the business of defendant H.I. Langworthy, Incorporated, in which corporation appellant claimed to be entitled to an interest, was destroyed. The facts alleged, upon which the cause of action is based, are pleaded substantially as follows: That for more than a year prior to September 1, 1927, respondent H.I. Langworthy was the duly authorized distributor of Chevrolet motor cars in the town of Compton, Los Angeles County, and was the sole agent, in said town, of the respondent Chevrolet Motor Company of California, for the sale of Chevrolet automobiles. That on July 14, 1927, said respondent H.I. Langworthy organized a corporation under the name of H.I. Langworthy, Incorporated. The said corporation had a capital stock of $20,000 divided into 20,000…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.