Mills

Mills v. Richmond Company, Inc.

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 345·63 Cal. App. 594·219 P. 465
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 1923Civ. No. 4688.California1,233 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

This is an action for rescission of a contract for the purchase of two lots in the city of Richmond, Contra Costa County. The grounds of rescission are defendant’s breach of its covenant to perform street work. The case was before this court on a previous appeal ( 56 Cal. App. 774 [ 206 Pac. 486 ]), wherein it was held that the complaint pleaded a cause of action and the order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer thereto was reversed. On the trial of the case the parties stipulated to the material facts in controversy, but offered some evidence showing that the actual cost of the street work in front of these two lots would have been fifty dollars, but that the plaintiff had been led to believe that the entire street would be improved at the time the work in front of her lots was done. It was then stipulated that these lots were in a subdivision and that no street work had been done on the street where they were located except some grading. On these stipulations, and on the evidence offered, the trial court found that the covenant to perform the street work was a material consideration of the contract and that the plaintiff would not have agreed to purchase said lots except…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.