Fischer

Fischer v. Havelock

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 584·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 184·25 P.2d 864
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 10, 1933Docket No. 4850.California2,364 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The plaintiff had judgment for damages against the defendants in an action tried by the court sitting without a jury, on account of injuries received in an automobile collision with a truck driven by the defendant Have-lock, found by the court to be acting as the agent of the Texas Company. No issue is raised as to the liability of Havelock, nor as to the amount of damages awarded by the court. The Texas Company bases its appeal on the theory that Havelock, at the time of the collision, was an independent contractor.

The record shows that at all the times referred to in this appeal Havelock had charge of the distribution and sale of Texaco products, including gasoline, kerosene, oils, etc., kept by the company at Ukiah, whether in tanks belonging to the company, or belonging to Havelock does not appear. The gasoline, kerosene, oils, etc., belonged to the Texas Company, none of which was purchased by Havelock, but he was authorized to make sale thereof for cash and on credit to purchasers whose credit rating was first approved by the company. In the event that Havelock made any sale on credit to anyone not so approved by the company, he became personally liable. The prices at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.