Grant

Grant v. Warren

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 427·31 Cal. App. 453·160 P. 847
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 1916Civ. No. 1579.California2,509 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The appeal is from the judgment and also the order denying a motion for a new trial. It is virtually conceded, however, by appellant that by reason of irregularities as to the statement on motion for a new trial we are, in effect, limited to the consideration of the appeal from the judgment and to the determination of whether the findings support said judgment.

The findings necessary for an understanding of the situation are as follows: “That heretofore and on the 26th day of March, 1912, the plaintiff was the owner of five hundred and ninety-five per cent first mortgage bonds' of the par value of five hundred dollars each, issued by the Columbia Marble Quarries, Inc., a corporation. That the payment of said bonds was secured by a first lien, mortgage or deed of trust made by said Columbia Marble Quarries, Inc., on that certain property situated in the county of Tuolumne, state of California, which property is more particularly described in the complaint on file herein. That said property included a certain marble quarry hereinafter referred to as the marble quarry property. That at the time of the issuance of said bonds and continuously up to and until the time of the sale…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.