Corgiat

Corgiat v. Realty Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 228·86 Cal. App. 37·260 P. 573
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 1927Docket No. 5878.California1,217 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cashin, J.

An appeal from an order vacating and setting aside a judgment.

The action was brought by appellant against respondent corporation to recover damages for the alleged conversion of certain corporate stock. The summons was served on December 17, 1926, and thereafter a verified answer to the complaint was filed by respondent. A motion to set the cause for trial was regularly made by appellant, and the trial, by stipulation of counsel of record made in open court, was set for February 17, 1927, in department 2 of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, fol-' lowing which a notice of trial was served upon the attorneys of record for respondent. These attorneys failed to appear at the time the cause was heard, and the court entered its judgment in favor of appellant. Thereafter respondent served and filed a notice of motion for an order vacating the judgment upon the grounds that the same had been made and entered through the mistake, inadvertence, surprise, and excusable neglect of the respondent, and after a hearing the motion was granted on February 27, 1927.

The notice of motion, which was accompanied by a substitution of attorneys, referred to the verified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.