Martino

People v. Martino

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 548·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1122·297 P. 965
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 1931Docket No. 117.California493 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lamberson, J.

The defendant pleaded guilty to the offense of grand theft in the Superior Court of Fresno County and judgment was pronounced on January 2, 1931. No oral notice of appeal was given by the defendant at that time, but written notice of appeal was served and filed on January 5, 1931, under the provisions of section 1239 of the Penal Code, which provides as follows:

A motion to dismiss the .appeal has been made by respondent upon the ground that the defendant did not file with the clerk of the court, within two days after rendition of judgment, his written notice of appeal. It appears that January 4, 1931, the second day after judgment was pronounced, fell on Sunday, and it is contended by the appellant that he had until January 5, 1931, within which to serve and file his written notice of appeal. It has been aptly pointed out by appellant that a situation might arise where the entire period of two days for the giving of notice under section 1239 of the Penal Code would be covered by holidays, in which event there would be no judicial day upon which the appellant could file his written notice of appeal.

Respondent lays stress upon the use of the word “within” in section 1239 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.