Campbell

Campbell v. Grennan

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 481·1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 159·110 P. 156
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 1910Civ. No. 686.California2,133 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The evidence shows, as stated by appellant, that defendants’ house projects a little more than eighteen inches over and upon the west half of lot No. '33, in block 245, in the city of Vallejo. The defendants obtained title to the east half of this lot from one Mrs. Barr, who was the owner of the entire lot. In March, 1906, the plaintiff purchased the west half of said lot from the administrator of Mrs. Barr’s estate. The lot has a frontage on York street of fifty feet between two board fences which have stood in their present location for thirty years. The defendants do not claim title to the small strip in dispute through the deed from Mrs. Barr, but predicate their claim upon an oral agreement with her by which she and the defendant, Charles Grennan, agreed upon the division line. This agreement was never reduced to writing, hut it is admitted by appellant that “if this were an action between Mrs. Barr and the defendants, there is no doubt that she would be estopped from disturbing the defendants in their possession of the disputed ground, simply because she knowingly permitted defendants, to hold over the line.” But it is contended that the vital question in the case is: Was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.