Pacheco
People v. Pacheco
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Appellants and others named White, Pedro, Hickey and Jones were charged in an indictment with robbing one Hazelhofer of a sum of money, a stickpin and a quantity of alcoholic liquor. All with the exception of Hickey were found guilty by a jury, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison. Pacheco and Viola have appealed from orders denying their motions for a new trial, and from the judgments.
They claim that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdicts of the jury.
The robbery was committed during the evening of October 6, 1932. The evidence tends to show that Viola lived at Pacheco’s house in Oakland; that both were there at about 6:30 P. M. on said date. Shortly before that hour one Diffiore agreed to lend Pacheco a Chevrolet delivery truck. On the morning of the same day defendant White negotiated with Hazelhofer for the purchase of a quantity of alcohol, which the latter agreed to procure. During the afternoon White returned with appellant Viola, who, under the name of Marino, was represented to Hazelhofer to be a prospective purchaser of the liquor. The price was fixed, and Viola agreed to call for it at 5 o’clock P. M. At 4 o’clock White returned and stated…