Hartigan

Hartigan v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 325·38 Cal. App. 763·177 P. 484
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1918Civ. No. 2683.California272 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Petition for writ of mandate commanding the respondent to furnish to the petitioner its service of gas and electricity.

The court is of the opinion that the petition for the writ is deficient in its failure to state that the petitioner had complied with the rules and regulations formulated by the railroad commission under the Public Utilities Act of this state, the commission being given statutory control of the subject matter involved in this particular proceeding. For that reason the demurrer to the petition will be sustained, and leave to amend will not be granted in view of the admission of counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not complied with such rules and regulations. It would be idle to grant leave to amend, because the fact not existing, the petition could not he amended so as to truthfully allege it.

Aside from this, it has been disclosed upon the hearing of the application, that this writ was applied for in the first instance to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, and that upon an issue of law being joined in that proceeding by the interposition of a demurrer to the petition, the court sustained the demurrer without leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.