Ream

Ream v. Barr

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 172·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 143·291 P. 451
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 1930Docket No. 3885.California1,595 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Both the plaintiff and the parties defendant appeal from an order taxing costs in the above-entitled action. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion to strike out the cost bills filed by the defendants and the defendants appeal from the order of the court disallowing certain items in their cost bill, the order of the court disallowing only two items, to wit, $49.22, costs of tak ing the deposition of the defendant Monte S. Hemmy, and disallowing the sum of $100 attorneys’ fees to each one of the several defendants, being presented in the defendants’ brief for our consideration, we will give our attention only to the items here objected to.

The record shows that on or about July 12, 1927, the plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants in the Superior Court of Siskiyou County to recover damages in the sum of $50,000, the damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff for and on account of the publication by the defendants of certain false and defamatory charges, etc. All of the defendants were served by summons, and all of the defendants, excepting the defendant Zelle, employed as their attorneys Messrs. Tebbe & Tebbe of Yreka and Messrs. Carter &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.