Marsh

The appealherein is taken under what is known as the “alternative method”, as provided by section 953a et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure.

No attempt is made by appellants to comply with that part of Rule VIII of “Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal”, which provides that:

The most that appears from the briefs of appellants is that in a general way it is claimed that the trial court erred in its application of the law to what are asserted to be the facts of the case, and particularly that said court erred in its interpretation of the law as regards the provisions of a certain contract which was entered into between plaintiffs and the defendant. But nowhere in said briefs, or elsewhere, with either appropriate, or any reference to the record, is it specifically contended by appellants that any particular finding of fact made by the trial court is not supported by the evidence; nor that the judgment is not supported by the findings of fact. The only endeavor by appellants at a possibly attempted compliance with the rule to which attention has been directed is marked by the statement which appears in their opening brief that they “believe that every finding…