Church

Church v. Collins

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 745·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 383·124 P. 552
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 1912Civ. No. 921.California1,970 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the breach of an alleged agreement for the sale of certain real property.

A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and this appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment entered after and upon the order sustaining the demurrer.

It appears that, on January 17, 1911, the defendant and the firm of Lyman & Briggs, real estate brokers at Sebastopol, in Sonoma county, entered into a written agreement by the terms of which the former constituted the latter as his agents for the sale of the property described in said agreement. Acting under what they conceived to be authority so to do as conferred upon them by said agreement, Lyman & Briggs, on the ninth day of May, 1911, for the defendant, entered into a written contract with the plaintiff for the sale of said property to the latter, and the main question arising upon said transactions and presented here is whether said real estate brokers were authorized or empowered by their agreement with the defendant to make such or any contract, for the latter, for the sale of said property.

Although the defendant addresses some criticism to the complaint generally, his principal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.