Anderson

Anderson v. Berger

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 728·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 1011·282 P. 416
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1929Docket No. 6977.California1,386 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koford, J.

Plaintiff obtained judgment for #1,040, which was the amount of a deposit he made with the defendants when signing and leaving with them a proposal to purchase a confectionery store belonging to T. N. Smiley. The complaint was in three counts. The court made findings in favor of plaintiff on the first and third counts. The first was a common count for money had and received, and the third was based upon rescission for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations. The defendants are real estate brokers, with whom Smiley, the owner of the store, listed it for sale. In doing so he made written representations concerning the character and quality of the store. The brokers’ alleged fraud consisted in communicating these representations to plaintiff, thereby inducing him to make the deposit and proposal of purchase. The proposal was signed by plaintiff alone. It read in substance and effect, I hereby deposit with defendants the sum of #1,040 as part payment of the purchase price of Smiley’s confectionery listed by the owner thereof with the defendants as agents for the sale thereof, and I hereby agree to buy said property upon the following terms and conditions. The proposal also said, “As the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.