Canupis

Fresno Irrigated Farms Co. v. Canupis

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 79·39 Cal. App. 184·178 P. 300
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1918Civ. No. 2602.California1,072 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to quiet title.

On July 10, 1912, an agreement was entered into between the plaintiff and defendants for the purchase and sale of certain real property in Fresno County, for the sum of three thousand dollars, payable in installments. By the express terms of the contract time was made of the essence thereof. This suit was brought for the purpose of quieting the title to the land in question against any claim of the defendants. They answered setting up the contract, upon which they were in arrears, as a defense to the action. The case came on for trial, and upon the evidence and stipulation of counsel as to certain facts a judgment was awarded in favor of plaintiff, from which the defendants prosecute this appeal.

The only question raised thereby is whether or not an action to quiet title was proper under the circumstances of the case. It is the contention of the appellants that there was no evidence of the breach other than failure to pay an overdue installment, and that under the circumstances the plaintiff should have resorted either to an action to rescind, or should have notified the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.