Maloney

Maloney v. Houston

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 717·51 Cal. App. 585·197 P. 661
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 1921Civ. No. 3481.California1,434 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants. On September 6, 1918, defendants, who were in possession of two certain concessions at Seal-Beach, California, known ,as “Auto Parking Station” and “Tent City and Delicatessen Store,” of which they claimed to be the owners, entered into a written contract with plaintiff whereby, for the sum of $2,000, to be by him paid, they agreed to sell an undivided one-half interest in the property. Of the consideration so specified, $700 was paid by plaintiff at the time of the execution of the contract; and it was provided therein that the balance of $1,300 was to be paid on or before September 26, 1918, at which time a written contract of copartnership was to be executed for the conduct of the business. The contract contained a clause as follows: “It is further agreed by the parties hereto that no party to this agreement has any personal obligations or otherwise, nor will they contract any obligations that would he a lien on said concessions without the written consent of all parties hereto without forfeiting their rights in this agreement and in said concessions. Current running expenses and necessities of life…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.