Lapique

Alleging himself to be the successor in interest of Maria Espíritu Chijulla de Leonis in a certain judgment rendered in the superior court of Los Angeles County June 3, 1901, against Prank E. Walsh, administrator of the estate of Laurent Etehepare, deceased, appellant sought to enforce the judgment and to have it carried into execution, under the provisions of section 685 of the Code of Civil Procedure. His motion was denied and he has appealed from the order denying him the relief sought.

Appellant’s presentation of his ease on appeal, in propria persona, has been vague and ambiguous and the record unsatisfactory. We have not had the assistance of any respondent’s brief in the case. Neither parties, nor counsel protecting their interests, appear here to support the action of. the lower court. Counsel for the respondent, by reason of their great familiarity with this matter, could have saved the court much of the work imposed by this appeal had they filed1 here a short, -concise statement of the case with a Brief citation of authorities. Their neglect and failure to do so is inexcusable. Enough appears, however, from the record of the proceedings, and from the briefs of…