Stern

Stern v. Sunset Road Oil Co.

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 582·47 Cal. App. 334·190 P. 651
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 1920Civ. No. 3196.California4,187 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

This action was originally commenced by the Kern Valley Bank. Prior to trial W. R. Williams, superintendent of banks, was substituted as plaintiff, he then having charge of the affairs of said Kern Valley Bank for the purposes of liquidation. Later Williams was succeeded as superintendent of banks by Charles F. Stern, and the latter was thereupon substituted as plaintiff and respondent. The action concerns the sale and delivery of oil. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad Company for the sum of $8,926.35, plus $5,908.25 interest from which judgment said defendant Railroad Company ap-. peals.

The facts are substantially without conflict, and are as follows: On July 1, 1907, defendant Sunset Road Oil Company, a corporation, and its subsidiary corporation, Operators Oil Company, contracted in writing with the defendant San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad Company to sell and deliver to the latter all oil required for the use of said railroad company for a period of five years, two hundred thousand barrels of which was to be stored prior to January 1, 1908, and the remainder to be delivered to and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.