Exposita

Exposita v. United Railroads

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 687·42 Cal. App. 320·183 P. 576
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 1919Civ. No. 2878.California1,101 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered against her upon a verdict of a jury. The action was one for damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff while attempting to alight from one of defendant’s street-cars at Fifteenth and Church Streets, in San Francisco. The complaint alleged • that while the plaintiff was attempting to alight from the defendant’s car, the car started and threw her to the ground, causing serious internal injury.

The appellant argues two questions upon the appeal. The first contention is that the court erred in refusing to permit a nine year old child to testify for plaintiff on the ground that she was too young, without any examination of the proffered witness. The plaintiff testified as to the occurrence of the alleged accident, and her testimony was corroborated by that of Primo Mileti, alleged to have been with her at the time. She also offered the testimony of her nine year old daughter, who, it is asserted by her, was present at the time of the accident and witnessed it. The preliminary questions by the court disclosed the fact that at the time of the accident the child was eight years and four months…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.