Beam

Beam v. Dugan

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 546·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 346·23 P.2d 58
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 1933Docket No. 8999.California2,313 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

The plaintiff sued to quiet title and for an accounting claiming under a sale and two assignments of portions of a land owner’s royalty in oil aggregating one per cent of the total royalty payable to their grantors. Defendants had judgment and the plaintiffs appeal upon typewritten transcripts.

The conveyances to the plaintiffs and to their assignors were executed in March, 1923. In form and substance they are identical. The one to the plaintiffs after describing the real property by metes and bounds recites: “And whereas, said above described property, together with other property, has been leased for oil development under a lease, of date, July 18, 1922, between John Dugan and wife and others, as lessors, and Vern Dumas and wife, as lessees, . . . and it being provided among other things in said lease that the owners of said property, covered by said lease, shall receive a royalty of one fifth (1/5) of all oil or kindred substances developed on said lease. . . .

In January, 1928, the Dugans obtained quitclaim deeds from Vern Dumas and his wife and from numerous other persons claiming interests arising out of the Dumas lease and soon thereafter executed a new oil and gas lease…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.