McCaw

Peninsula Burner & Oil Co. v. McCaw

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 569·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 445·3 P.2d 40
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 1931Docket No. 7826.California693 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Action in claim and delivery. The property described in the complaint is an oil storage tank and a nonautomatic oil burner, together with pipes, valves and fittings necessary for the complete installation in a home. The complaint alleges that plaintiff agreed to sell the above-described equipment to one Lawton to be installed in the home of defendants which Lawton was erecting. Defendants deny that they wrongfully withheld the property and affirmatively allege that they purchased the same from Law-ton for a valuable consideration. Further, that the property was installed by Lawton in the home of respondents as improvements therein, and said equipment became a material part of the real property of defendants. The answer further alleges that after the property was installed, notice of completion of said home was filed in the office of the county recorder where the property was situate and that plaintiff filed no claim for the same in accordance with the Material-men’s Lien Law. As a separate and further defense, the answer alleges plaintiff was estopped by reason of its laches to recover the property and further, that plaintiff did not notify defendants until more than two years…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.