Bodholdt

Bodholdt v. Garrett

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 566·10 P.2d 533
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 1932Docket No. 8135.California863 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ward, J.

These consolidated cases are actions for damages for certain personal injuries, brought under section 2, chapter 328, of the Statutes of 1923, page 675, which provides, in substance, that counties, municipalities, etc., shall be liable for injuries to persons and property resulting from the dangerous or defective condition of public property where the officers having authority to remedy such condition had knowledge or notice of the defective or dangerous condition and failed or neglected, for a reasonable time after acquiring such knowledge or receiving such notice, to take such action as might be necessary to remedy the condition or protect the public against such danger.

One of the plaintiff’s witnesses, immediately after the accident, inquired of an injured plaintiff as to his condition and thereafter walked across the street to interview the defendant Garrett. By question and answer the witness elicited the information from Garrett, the truck driver in the employ of the city, that the collision was due to a broken spring on the front portion of the truck. Appellants complain that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that this statement or admission of the driver was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.