Courtney

Courtney v. Tufeld

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 504·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 302·17 P.2d 1035
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1932Docket No. 4637.California1,003 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

King, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a ease brought under the Usury Law. (Act 3757, Gen. Laws.)

The complaint alleges that Ben J. Tufeld agreed to loan plaintiffs $1474 on October' 30, 1925, and on said date plaintiffs executed to him their note for $1474 with interest at eight per cent per annum, principal payable in installments as follows: $184.25 on November 30, 1925, and a like amount on the thirtieth day of each month thereafter until paid, “interest paid in advance”. Plaintiffs also gave a chattel mortgage to secure payment of the note. The mortgage was immediately assigned to defendant Fidelity Reserve Corporation. It is then alleged that defendant Tufeld upon receiving the note and mortgage presented to plaintiffs a check for $1474 and asked plaintiffs to indorse the same “In order that he might cash the said check and take out the interest charges which he demanded in advance.” It is then alleged that plaintiffs indorsed the check and gave it to defendant Tufeld, who then handed plaintiffs $1,000 in cash, and this sum was all that plaintiffs received on the loan. The complaint further alleges that plaintiffs paid to defendants the sum of $184.25 on November 30, 1925;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.