Botwin

Botwin v. Wise

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 772·46 Cal. App. 465·189 P. 312
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 1920Civ. No. 3239.California1,033 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gosbey, J.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor. The action was submitted to the trial court and to this court upon agreed and stipulated facts as follows:

On the twentieth day of March, 1913, the defendant, Nathan Wise, was the entryman upon a homestead of the United States government consisting of 160 acres, located in the county of Los Angeles, state of California, and particularly described as follows, to wit: The northwest one-quarter of section 5, township 1 south, range 18 west, S. B. M. Said Nathan Wise (to be designated’ hereinafter as defendant) as such entryman then and there was and continued to be in possession of said property until the twenty-fourth day of April, 1916, when a patent was issued to defendant for said land by the government of the United States; that ever since the last-mentioned date said defendant continued to be the owner in fee of said property. On said twentieth day of March, 1913, plaintiff made and entered into a written agreement with said defendant and said Alfora Wise in substance as follows: That whereas defendant had been in possession of said property under an entry of homestead from the United States government, had made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.