Stepp

Stepp v. Williams

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 281·52 Cal. App. 237·198 P. 661
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 1921Civ. No. 2230.California8,660 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The defendants own certain lands in Modoc County, California, upon which there is a spring, the waters of which flow over and across the lands of defendants; plaintiffs claim a four-fifths interest in the spring and in the waters flowing therefrom under an alleged oral grant from Chas. W. Williams, deceased, the predecessor in interest of defendants. Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet their alleged title to the waters of said spring, and for an injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the said waters claimed by plaintiffs. Defendants, Judith E. Williams, both in her individual and representa tive capacity, and Gary Williams, answered said complaint, denying the allegations of the complaint as to the grant of said waters of said spring, and by way of cross-complaint alleged the ownership of said spring and the lands on which the same is located, and a right and title to said spring by reason thereof, and by reason of their riparian rights and by prescription.

The court, in substance, found as follows: The spring, the right to the waters of which is in controversy here, is situated on the lands of the defendants, who, as to said lands, are the successors in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.